<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2d1 20170631//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>revista-medicina-scolara</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>The Journal of School and University Medicine</JournalTitle>
      <PISSN/>
      <EISSN/>
      <Volume-Issue>Volume 5 Issue 4</Volume-Issue>
      <PartNumber/>
      <IssueTopic>Multidisciplinary</IssueTopic>
      <IssueLanguage>English</IssueLanguage>
      <Season>October 2018</Season>
      <SpecialIssue>N</SpecialIssue>
      <SupplementaryIssue>N</SupplementaryIssue>
      <IssueOA>Y</IssueOA>
      <PubDate>
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>31</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <ArticleType>Medical</ArticleType>
      <ArticleTitle>Informed consent to adults</ArticleTitle>
      <SubTitle/>
      <ArticleLanguage>English</ArticleLanguage>
      <ArticleOA>Y</ArticleOA>
      <FirstPage>48</FirstPage>
      <LastPage>54</LastPage>
      <AuthorList>
        <Author>
          <FirstName>Dr. Rajka</FirstName>
          <LastName>Mária</LastName>
          <AuthorLanguage>English</AuthorLanguage>
          <Affiliation/>
          <CorrespondingAuthor>N</CorrespondingAuthor>
          <ORCID/>
        </Author>
      </AuthorList>
      <DOI/>
      <Abstract>Informed consent is the basis of daily medical practice, whereby, on the one hand, the doctor informs the patient about the consultation, investigations and treatments, and on the other hand, the patient decides whether or not he wishes to take part in them. The relationship between the doctor and the patient is based on the decision by which the patient adheres or not to the medical act, and he can not be constrained in his choice. From a legal point of view, only competent patients have the right to decide on treatments themselves, according to the principle of autonomy.</Abstract>
      <AbstractLanguage>English</AbstractLanguage>
      <Keywords>patient autonomy, information, self-determination, refusal of treatment</Keywords>
      <URLs>
        <Abstract>https://www.revista-medicina-scolara.ro/ubijournal-v1copy/journals/abstract.php?article_id=9277&amp;title=Informed consent to adults</Abstract>
      </URLs>
      <References>
        <ReferencesarticleTitle>References</ReferencesarticleTitle>
        <ReferencesfirstPage>16</ReferencesfirstPage>
        <ReferenceslastPage>19</ReferenceslastPage>
        <References>1. Alua? M. Slovakia forced sterilization on Rroma women practices. An ethical case analyze. Studia UBB Bioethica 2015 december;LX(2):103-113.&#13;
&#13;
2. Dumitra?cu D. Comunicare medical?. Curs pentru studen?ii la medicin?. Cluj Napoca: Editura Medical? Universitar? „Iuliu Ha?ieganu”, 2013.  &#13;
&#13;
3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethic. Seventh Edition.  New York: Oxford University Press 2013.&#13;
&#13;
4. Leavitt J, Leavitt F. Improving Medical Outcomes. The psychology of Doctor-Patient Visits. Lanham: Rowmanand;Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2011.&#13;
&#13;
5. Alua? M. Bioetic? Medical?. Cluj Napoca: Editura Medical? Universitar? „Iuliu Ha?ieganu”; 2016.&#13;
&#13;
6. Zanc I, Lupu I. Bioetica medical?. Principii, dileme, solu?ii. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Medical? Universitar? „Iuliu Ha?ieganu” 2009.&#13;
&#13;
7. Kovand;aacute;cs J. A modern orvosi etika alapjai. 2-ik kiadand;aacute;s. Budapest: Medicina Kand;ouml;nyvkiadand;oacute;; 1999.&#13;
&#13;
8. World Medical Association. Declaration of Lisabon on The rights of the patient, 1981. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-lisbon-on-the-rights-of-the-patient/ accesat la 15.10.2018 &#13;
&#13;
9. Mappes TA, Degrazia D. Medical Bioethics. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishers; 2001.&#13;
&#13;
10. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Oviedo, 1997. http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168007cf98, accesat la 15.10.2018.&#13;
&#13;
11. Mangu F. Malpraxisul medical. R?spunderea civil? medical?. Bucure?ti: Ed. Wolters-Kluver 2010.&#13;
&#13;
12. Legea 95/2006 privind reforma and;icirc;n domeniul s?n?t??ii. http://legeaz.net/legea-95-2006/art-649, accesat la 15.10.2018 &#13;
&#13;
13. Declaration of Helsinki.&#13;
&#13;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki, accesat la 15.10.2018.&#13;
&#13;
14. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 1964. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/&#13;
&#13;
accesat la 15.10.2018.&#13;
&#13;
15. Ioan B, Ast?r?stoae V (ed). Dileme etice la finalul vie?ii. Ia?i: Editura Polirom; 2013.&#13;
&#13;
16. Noul Cod civil actualizat 2016 – Legea 287/2009. http://legeaz.net/noul-cod-civil/, accesat la 15.10.2018.&#13;
&#13;
17. Aluas M, Rajka MA. Consim??mand;acirc;ntul informat and;icirc;n cazul minorilor. Revista de Medicin? ?colar? ?i Universitar? 2015;2(3):48-50.&#13;
&#13;
18. Legea nr. 46/2003. legea drepturilor pacientului. http://www.dreptonline.ro/legislatie/legea_drepturilor_pacientului.php, accesat la 15.10.2018.&#13;
&#13;
Anexa https://www.hosptm.ro/files/juridic/2016/Ordinul-MS-nr-1411-din-12-dec-2016.pdf</References>
      </References>
    </Journal>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>