Join us   Log in  


Pages: 14-21
Print Article   Download XML  Download PDF


Author: Kishore Narayanan, Benjamin M Sagayaraj, Nidhi Sharma, Santosh Kumar Kamalakannan

Category: Medical


Introduction: The current pandemic has affected the education of children in an unprecedented way. Children are not able to go to school and in a short span of time schools have tried to come up with online teaching methods which have not been validated. This study was undertaken to assess children's viewpoint on this new mode of teaching.

Aims: The primary objective of the present study was to assess the clarity, logical flow and effectiveness of online teaching learning in middle school and high school students. The secondary objective was to assess the student satisfaction after 6 months of online teaching. We also wanted to identify the mental health of students after e-learning.

Methodology: After obtaining consent from parents and school principal, a questionnaire on new learning method and the ease of understanding was shared with students in google form.Their responses were assessed in various dimensions.

Results: Students felt lonely and tired at the end of e-learning sessions. They felt that they are missing on co-curricular and extracurricular activities. There was difficulty in falling asleep and missing of peer groups.

Conclusions: E –learning is the need of the hour. Despite user ease and accessibility, e–learning cannot completely replace in-campus learning. Multiple aspects of student mental health are being compromised in a pure e-learning school. Blended learning is a useful modality and its implications remain to be analyzed.

Keywords: e-learning, in-campus learning, online teaching

DOI: 10.51546/JSUM.2022.9202



  1. Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
  2. resources/assessment-measures
  4. Insights into Editorial: Can online learning replace the school classroom?
  5. Brandt, D. A. (1997). Constructivism: teaching for understanding of the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 112–117.
  6. About Universal Design for Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved on June 8, 2020 from Courtney-Long, E.A., Romano, S.D., Carroll, D.D. et al. (2017).
  7. Sloan Consortium Elements of Quality: The Sloan-C Framework. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for OnLine Education, 2002.
  8. A New Pedagogy is Emerging... and Online Learning is a Key Contributing Factor, August 04, 2020, “”
  9. Alexandre Vallée1, MD, PhD & Jacques Blacher1, MD, PhD & Alain Cariou2, MD, PhD & Emmanuel Sorbets1, MD, PhD - Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
  10. Taylor, A. & Shallish, L. (2019). The logic of bio-meritocracy in the promotion of higher education equity, Disability & Society, DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2019.1613962
  11. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system - Shu- Sheng Liaw -General Education Center, China Medical University, 91 Shiuesh Road, Taichung 404, Taiwan – Sept 2007.
  12. Capper, J. (2001). E-learning growth and promise for the developing world. TechKnowLogia, May/June. . Retrieved July 20, 2007.
  13. Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 299–305.
  14. "TFD Encyclopedia – Moodle".
  15. Vijay Govindarajan and Anup Srivastava (March 31, 2020), What the Shift to Virtual Learning Could Mean for the Future of Higher Ed
  16. Politico Magazine, 03/19/2020
  17. Published on The Internet and Education (2020), Article from the book “Change: 19 Key Essays on How the Internet Is Changing Our Lives”